Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0939

reference
563-tree-1
name
0939
tree-preservation-order

undefined

563-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028137 50.881161)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028080 50.881155,-1.028083 50.881166,-1.028091 50.881176,-1.028103 50.881184,-1.028119 50.881189,-1.028136 50.881191,-1.028154 50.881190,-1.028170 50.881185,-1.028183 50.881177,-1.028191 50.881167,-1.028194 50.881156,-1.028192 50.881145,-1.028184 50.881135,-1.028171 50.881126,-1.028156 50.881121,-1.028138 50.881119,-1.028120 50.881121,-1.028104 50.881126,-1.028092 50.881134,-1.028083 50.881144,-1.028080 50.881155)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL